Intelligence Summit

Home Forums Living in Brazil Intelligence Summit

This topic contains 33 replies, has 22 voices, and was last updated by  EricSGU 15 years, 9 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #36042

    dalmata
    Member

    Next week I’m going to the Intelligence Summitt in Washington DC:http://www.intelligencesummit.org/schedule.phphttp://www.intelligencesummit.org/if anyone has any curiosity about the information covered please send me a PM.

  • #36913

    lenine
    Member

    If you read one book this year, read “Funding Evil” by Rachel Ehrenfeld. Its banned in the UK, due to a Saudi, and due to Britain’s peculiar slander laws. This same Saudi sued and prevented 29 other Authors from publishing.

  • #36914

    EricSGU
    Member

    What’s peculiar about the UK’s slander laws? I assume it’s about arabs funding terrorism?

  • #36916

    EricSGU
    Member

    Its the Libel laws. without getting technical all the suing is done in the UK. in the UK basically, the person being sued has to prove he didn’t slander, rather than the person suing having to prove that he was slandered. no one has ever attempted the same thing here. the suits have been settled early, with official apologies, donations by the authors to a specified charity. 29 authors. anyone trying to expose terrorist funding.Liberace (a very flamboyantly gay pianist, probably before your time), won a slander suit over there because a paper said he was gay.Anyway, the point is the book. It is about Arabs funding terrorism, however, the scale and insidiousness is alarming. the war on terror is far from over.

  • #36917

    inglesa85
    Member

    [QUOTE=PeterNYC] the war on terror is far from over. [/QUOTE] Oh, you don’t say?

  • #36922

    Anonymous

    Ahhhhhhh!!!!! She’s back . . .

  • #36923

    what i meant to say was, we could actually losethe war on terror. we could eventually have a world that is Islamist. Red China on one hand, and Islam on the other.

  • #36935

    romaroma
    Member

    [QUOTE=PeterNYC]what i meant to say was, we could actually losethe war on terror. we could eventually have a world that is Islamist. Red China on one hand, and Islam on the other.[/QUOTE] That war is already lost, and it is not because of what Islam does. It is because of what the Occident does to itself.

  • #37424
  • #37617

    EricSGU
    Member
  • #38210

    Stymmesara
    Member
  • #38830

    sphiatt
    Member
  • #39032
  • #39055

    lenine
    Member

    A summit is a place where one man can stand with nothing about him other than the thin, rarefied air.

  • #39066

    Badcam
    Member

    and a fala serio to you too . . .

  • #39222

    The Mole
    Member

    [QUOTE=PeterNYC]what i meant to say was, we could actually losethe war on terror. we could eventually have a world that is Islamist. Red China on one hand, and Islam on the other.[/QUOTE] what about the people who dont want to adopt Islam, praying 5 times a day to the east whilst making sure compass is working properly. The subject crops up throughout the pages on this site. Some people just want to get on with their lives.I am reminded of a very old joke (because I am very old) where two students are walking to university and they pass a jewellers. One says to the other “when the revolution comes everyone will have a gold watch like that”. The other student just nods. Then his mate says “and look at all those nice houses” when the revolution comes everyone will live in houses like those” again his mate just nods. Then a Rolls Royce drives by and he says”when the revolution comes everyone will have a Rolls Royce” this time his mate responds with” you know I dont really want a Rolls Royce” only to hear the reply “when the revolution comes you will have what you are bloody well given”. I hope the point wasnt too subtle.

  • #39304

    jakewood
    Member
  • #39340

    Anonymous

    For PeterNYC – Golly – a clip from the NY Compost – at last gringoes hasgot some class. I found your other URL’s approriatel sickening, but Iwish you would provide headlines for them so we wouldn’t have to wastethe finger power to click on them, only to have to exit immediately toavoid the stench. But I digress. There was one delightful paragraph from the Post clip that said it all: “Clearly, the War on Terror – and specifically, theIraq campaign – is more dependent on the use (or abuse) of informationthan most wars. And so it’s truly astounding that the Bush folks seemto put so little emphasis on getting good information – and disseminating it to America’s advantage.” Honest folks, I’m not making this up – read it foryourself That post from the Post really said this! Wow! And all along, I thought Dubbya and his gang of criminalswere throwing out most of the information that their informants hadbrought them because it didn’t justify his pre-9/11 plans, i.e., tosmash Iraq and make whatever survived a more reliable source of cheapoil and a site for permanent bases. Silly me. I must havebeen reading the liberal press again. And that’s not all – those creepy libs even tried to makepeople believe that Donald Rumsfeld was so dissatisfied with thequality of the pretexts for invasion that he had demanded fromthe CIA that he set up his own little mini-CIA to give him theright intelligence. And, you know what? I fell for it. Dang, butI’m naive.Shocked

  • #39376

    jakewood
    Member

  • #39675

    andy6053
    Member

    Malignant Narcissism. A concept expounded on vis a vis the liberals by Tammy Bruce in her book “The Death of Right and Wrong.” It is the core of what’s wrong with the liberals today.
    Narcissists are not open to self-examination or self-criticizism, which is one reason why the liberal movement, which was so vital in the 60s, has deteriorated to the state it is in today, and is destroying the Democratic party in the US. It is an ideology that has not self-corrected at all in the last 40 years.

  • #39712

    Badcam
    Member

    What is a “liberal”?What is a “conservative”?What is a “radical”?All these concepts are a bit foreign to us in Brazil. I particularly don’t really know what they mean.Can you explain and define?

  • #39717

    Badcam
    Member

    A conservative is a liberal who has been mugged!

  • #39718

    Badcam
    Member

    What happens to an islamite who has been mugged?

  • #39719

    mercy224
    Member

    I think I see these terms regularly in Veja but let me try aBrazilian allusion…Lula gained his fame as a ‚Äòradical‚Äô, won the election as a‚Äòliberal‚Äô but tries to govern as a ‚Äòconservative‚Äô…

  • #39720

    x32792
    Member

    Oh, oh. Dunga blew it and didn‚Äôt read the previous posts…‚Äôradicals‚Äôare out of control malignancies like Tammy Bruce, ‚Äòconservatives‚Äô are righteousdefenders of the original intent like Donald Rumsfeld, and ‚Äòliberals‚Äô areflamboyant gay frenchmen like Liberace. That‚Äôs better.

  • #39724

    markg_4321
    Member

  • #39812

    ” France!

  • #39833

    floripa
    Member

    Oui

  • #40221

    Sian
    Member
  • #40602

    EricSGU
    Member
  • #40641

    Anonymous

    believe it or not, all of the below is true:http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,192762,00.html

  • #40691

    Sian
    Member

    the above is from a weekly series on the foxnews website:http://www.foxnews.com/called “Tongue Tied”. all of the accounts are true; political correctness. if you like to be aware of current events, you should take a look at it every week.

  • #41303

    EricSGU
    Member

    An email I received today. Their information is generally accurate: st1:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) }

    Folks:

    According to feedback received from those in attendance, this past weekend’s symposium exceeded expectations by a wide margin. Our experts removed their “kid” gloves to expose the truth about Islam and its threat to world peace and national security.

    America ‘s Truth Forum promised to drop a major bombshell at the event and that it did. During a pre-event conference, at the National Press Club, Dr. Paul Williamspublicized critical information that was secured from Hamid Mir – the only journalist who interviewed bin Laden since 9/11. According to Mir:

    a). Al Qaeda has a nuclear arsenal.

    b). A number of nuclear weapons have been forward-deployed to our soil and unknown locations in
    Europe.

    c). The Taliban has retaken large areas in Afghanistanin addition to three provinces in Pakistan.

    d). Iranand al Qaeda have formed an alliance against the United States and western interests.
    Military action against Iranwill result in detonations on our soil.

    e). In 2000, al Qaeda tested a nuclear weapon (most likely a dirty bomb) in the Kunar Province of
    Afghanistan. As a direct result of that test, an engineer lost his eyesight.

    f). Over 1500 clerics and officials have been executed in Pakistanfor openly supporting Musharraf’s
    regime.

    Weeks earlier, Mir reported to Dr. Williams that Osama bin Laden was not only alive and well but about to release a videotaped message to Al Jazeera. For well over a week, the mainstream media blocked all of my attempts to publicize that message. The information was released in a Worldnetdaily article thatappeared two full days prior to Al Jazeera’s posting of OBL’s menacing address. (This fact alone should have greatly boosted Mir’s credibility and caused a media blitz).

    At the conference, Dr. Williams and I introduced the following account in support of Mir’s contention regarding al Qaeda’s nuclear capabilities:

    The Israelis apprehended a Pakistani terrorist with a nuclear device in 2001. The arrest took place on Israel’s southern border with Jordan- at the AllenbyBridgecrossing. Subsequent reports upgraded the weapon from a dirty bomb to a tactical nuclear weapon – a plutonium fusion device that was capable of producing a 3-10 kiloton blast. According to Richard Sales, a former intelligence correspondent for UPI, this seizure was confirmed by American intelligence agencies, CIA operatives imbedded in the KGB and the Israeli Mossad.

    Several days ago, Hamid Mir advised Dr. Williams that a squad of 12 assassins (9 Afghans and 3 Pakistanis) was recently dispatched through Iranto execute the Danish cartoonists – another story ignored by the media.

    As expected, many of those in attendance came from various federal and state law enforcement agencies. To date, nothing discussed has been contested. If anything, several agents have contacted us in search of additional information. Yet, the mainstream media has done much to block the dissemination of what was brought to light by our nation’s leading experts. Perhaps, “fair and balanced” no longer applies.

    America ‘s Truth Forum is being encouraged to host a similar event on the West Coast. We are currently looking into that potential and plan to release details on our website.

    Your continued support is greatly appreciated.

    Respectfully,

    Jeffrey Epstein

    http://www.americastruthforum.com

  • #7829

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.