For all Yanks with bank accounts in Brasil
Printed From: Gringoes.com
Category: Brazil
Forum Name: Investing in Brazil
Forum Discription: Land, Real Estate, Setting up a Business
URL: http://www.gringoes.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=12341
Printed Date: 18 May 2013 at 06:59 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 8.05a - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: For all Yanks with bank accounts in Brasil
Posted By: Gringo.Floripa
Subject: For all Yanks with bank accounts in Brasil
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 12:21
This goes out to all Yanks who have bank accounts in Brasil (or elsewhere), which have an aggregate value over 10 thousand USD. Don't be a dumb-ass Yank, and fail to file a report with the Treasury Dept. disclosing your account(s)!
Yes, I know, it sucks; IMO it's really none of their business; I personally hate doing it, but by failing to do so, you might find yourself landing in jail next time you fly back to the US. I'm quite serious.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304563104576363650392836000.html?mod=WSJ_article_RecentColumns_WeekendInvestor - IRS Issues New Guidelines For Overseas Accounts
You have until August 31st of this year to voluntarily disclose any accounts you have been failing to report. As for what happens after 31/08, I can only assume the bloodhounds will be released, and the hunt will be on. Risky business, given the times in which we live....
The link below has the forms you need, as well as guidelines for filing the FBAR report. You have until June 30th to submit the report regarding accounts you had in 2010. The due date is the same every year; there's no extension. BTW, you are NOT taxed on the money, you just need to disclose it.
http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=148849,00.html - Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) FYI, I disclose the amount of my balance on 31/12, determined by the forex rate on 31/12, NOT the "highest balance" (or best forex) at anytime during the calendar year, which would be too burdensome to calculate.
------------- I might bark, but I don't bite.
(trolls, sock puppets, Brasil-bashers, and "Joined:Today" persons too lazy to use the Search function excluded; cry babies too)
|
Replies:
Posted By: sven
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 12:39
Errr, so how would the IRS know how much you have in your overseas account without you informing this?
------------- We live in an age when unnecessary things are our only necessities.
~Oscar Wilde
|
Posted By: Kalle Anka
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 13:14
|
Yes, I know, it sucks; IMO it's really none of their business
I agree that it's none of their business. What's more, they may consider any interest on such a hypethetical account as taxable unearned income which is not subject to the basic exclusion for taxes paid on earned income in Brazil paid to Brazil. Why give them the rope they can hang you with?
|
Posted By: Gringo.Floripa
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 13:35
Originally posted by Kalle Anka
Why give them the rope they can hang you with? |
Don't shoot the messenger!
If you're not still filing a US tax return, then you might not need to be concerned. Yet if you are, there is the slight problem of a little box you're required to check, yes or no, which asks if you have any foreign accounts. Caught lying, you can be in deep merda. I was very serious about possibly facing jail time.
Trust me, I am FAR from being Dudley Do-Right when it comes to full compliance with the whims and wishes of any gov't. Yet after much research, this was one area I decided wasn't worth evading. Now when the day comes Uncle Sam wants to actually tax this money (which might be sooner than we think), then I will need to revisit this topic and most likely revise my line of thinking. But for now, I still earn some income in the US, therefore still file a tax return, therefore will continue (like it or not) to report my foreign accounts.
I'm just sending out the message about the voluntary disclosure window, which will close on August 31st, k?
------------- I might bark, but I don't bite.
(trolls, sock puppets, Brasil-bashers, and "Joined:Today" persons too lazy to use the Search function excluded; cry babies too)
|
Posted By: Gringo.Floripa
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 13:42
Originally posted by sven
Errr, so how would the IRS know how much you have in your overseas account without you informing this? |
How could Switzerland, KNOWN AND TRUSTED for their banking privacy and secrecy laws, kneel down before the US, and turn over info on account holders?!? 
------------- I might bark, but I don't bite.
(trolls, sock puppets, Brasil-bashers, and "Joined:Today" persons too lazy to use the Search function excluded; cry babies too)
|
Posted By: sven
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 14:25
Originally posted by Gringo.Floripa
I'm just sending out the message about the voluntary disclosure window, which will close on August 31st, k?
|
So if the window closes, they'll start rounding up people for waterboarding and sleep deprivation sessions?
Don't you just love the land of the "free"...
------------- We live in an age when unnecessary things are our only necessities.
~Oscar Wilde
|
Posted By: Esprit
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 14:30
|
It´s reasonable to assume that if details of money held on deposit in a Brazilian bank account is declared to the IRS, it follows that they would be interested to learn about how this money came into being and about any interest earned as income. In addition they would want to know the time scale of the account, interest paid to date and if such interest earnings had been previously declared on earlier tax returns; catch 22!
I would suggest that the likelihood of all Brazilian banks providing a comprehensive list of ex-pat bank details to a foreign nation is a bit of a stretch of the imagination given the nature of Brazil´s banking system which is not at all like the Swiss laundry. In any event I suspect that the IRS are more interested in the multiple zero big fish money that is worth the effort of chasing.
------------- Esprit
|
Posted By: Gringo.Floripa
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 15:06
Originally posted by Esprit
I would suggest that the likelihood of all Brazilian banks providing a comprehensive list of ex-pat bank details to a foreign nation is a bit of a stretch of the imagination given the nature of Brazil´s banking system which is not at all like the Swiss laundry. |
I believe you're correct Esprit. However, never say never, and never say "It can't/won't happen here"....
Originally posted by Esprit
In any event I suspect that the IRS are more interested in the multiple zero big fish money that is worth the effort of chasing. |
Exactly. Yet this agency of the devil, the Infernal Revenue Service, loves to reel in some small fry every now and then, just to "make an example" of them, and parade them about. And since I am small fry, as much as I hate the sniffing nose in my personal business, I'll comply (for now).
Plus, I enjoy shopping at Costco and Home Depot way too much to cease my trips to the US anytime in the near future. 
------------- I might bark, but I don't bite.
(trolls, sock puppets, Brasil-bashers, and "Joined:Today" persons too lazy to use the Search function excluded; cry babies too)
|
Posted By: Dom Pedro
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 15:26
A country which taxes its citizen on their worldwide income EVEN if they permanently reside abroad (and should have been treated as non-resident for tax purposes by any civilized country) resembles me a medieval slave owner, not a modern XXI century state.
------------- No, I don´t take drugs. My dreams are already scary enough. M.C. Escher
|
Posted By: sven
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 15:27
Originally posted by Gringo.Floripa
I believe you're correct Esprit. However, never say never, and never say "It can't/won't happen here".... |
Well, it can't, not without a court order. The Patriot Act has no value here.
------------- We live in an age when unnecessary things are our only necessities.
~Oscar Wilde
|
Posted By: Ray
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 15:31
|
BIG thanks to GP. I heard about this, however, once I buy a Flat then I'll have to deal with it. My question is how can the US Gov find out if a US citizen owns and lives outside the US? At any rate, a great Topic and Thread.
|
Posted By: DUNGA
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 15:32
Originally posted by Esprit
I would suggest that the likelihood of all Brazilian banks providing a comprehensive list of ex-pat bank details to a foreign nation is a bit of a stretch of the imagination given the nature of Brazil´s banking system which is not at all like the Swiss laundry. In any event I suspect that the IRS are more interested in the multiple zero big fish money that is worth the effort of chasing. |
I would like to think Brazilian banks and the powers to be wouldn't be cooperative about turning over this information but I read a very brief article a couple years back about a newly enacted information agreement between the Receita Federal and the IRS that was scary but not detailed enough to be truly informative. But it did lead me to believe that, at some level, the 'will' is there. As to the 'way', the banks may seem disorganized at the branch management level but I would imagine that the databases are well maintained and up to date. Unfortunately, a data search for for account holders who are also U.S. nationals might be as likely to turn up those with account balances of R$30,000 as R$30,000,000, and turning over a mountain of data (for the IRS to sort out) might be a matter of national pride.
Who knows?
------------- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8hLc_nqx8g - Tales of Brave Ulysses
|
Posted By: Dom Pedro
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 15:41
Naturalize and put all your accounts under Brazilian ID.
------------- No, I don´t take drugs. My dreams are already scary enough. M.C. Escher
|
Posted By: sven
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 15:43
Originally posted by Dom Pedro
not a modern XXI century state. |
Well, the Patriot Act brings the US close to what used to be the USSR
------------- We live in an age when unnecessary things are our only necessities.
~Oscar Wilde
|
Posted By: sven
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 15:48
Originally posted by DUNGA
As to the 'way', the banks may seem disorganized at the branch management level but I would imagine that the databases are well maintained and up to date. Unfortunately, a data search for for account holders who are also U.S. nationals might be as likely to turn up those with account balances of R$30,000 as R$30,000,000, and turning over a mountain of data (for the IRS to sort out) might be a matter of national pride.Who knows? |
They way (possibility) may be there, but that will never happen. The Receita does not even have the possibility to look into the bank accounts of Brazilians unless they have a court order. Court orders are only possible in case of crimes. CPMF tax was held up for a long time because it allowed the IRS to have a view of what people had in their bank accounts, or at least their spending patterns.
------------- We live in an age when unnecessary things are our only necessities.
~Oscar Wilde
|
Posted By: Dom Pedro
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 15:50
Originally posted by sven
Originally posted by Dom Pedro
not a modern XXI century state. |
Well, the Patriot Act brings the US close to what used to be the USSR  |
The patriot act only legalized practices which de-facto existed in the US since 60-70's
------------- No, I don´t take drugs. My dreams are already scary enough. M.C. Escher
|
Posted By: Esprit
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 15:51
Originally posted by Dom Pedro
A country which taxes its citizen on their worldwide income EVEN if they permanently reside abroad (and should have been treated as non-resident for tax purposes by any civilized country) resembles me a medieval slave owner, not a modern XXI century state. |
This is an interesting point. If one has in fact officially changed one´s country of residence despite not having relinquished one´s citizenship of the former country, the issue of taxation would be taken up in one´s adopted country when of course worldwide earnings would be liable to tax. The former country should not be able to levy taxes under such circumstances?
------------- Esprit
|
Posted By: Gringo.Floripa
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 16:20
Originally posted by sven
Well, it can't, not without a court order. The Patriot Act has no value here. |
Was it a court order which convinced Switzerland to rat on it's account holders? I'd truly like to think Brasil, be it Dilma, or some future president, would give Tio Sam the middle finger, when asked to do the same. However, as the saying goes, politics makes for strange bedfellows. I have no doubt BACEN would love to have similar info about Brazzers who have US accounts.
------------- I might bark, but I don't bite.
(trolls, sock puppets, Brasil-bashers, and "Joined:Today" persons too lazy to use the Search function excluded; cry babies too)
|
Posted By: Esprit
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 16:28
We are walking down paranoia boulevard here. I´ve always used a `shy´ pen when completing tax returns and learned to live with the fear that some day they may find my wood in the forest. 
------------- Esprit
|
Posted By: sven
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 16:29
What would be the use of such info for the Central Bank?
------------- We live in an age when unnecessary things are our only necessities.
~Oscar Wilde
|
Posted By: Kalle Anka
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 16:35
|
Gringo Floripa wrote:
Don't shoot the messenger!
Sorry, not trying to shoot the messenger. It was good you posted this as some people may never have heard about this law or it's latest revision. People still filing in the US are in a more sensitive situation. And Brazil will want to know about foreign as in US accounts as well when one files here. Could be a motive for some under the table cooperation I suppose. Thanks for the article.
|
Posted By: Gringo.Floripa
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 16:36
Originally posted by sven
What would be the use of such info for the Central Bank? |
Sorry, mistake... make that the RF.... They're all one in the same.
------------- I might bark, but I don't bite.
(trolls, sock puppets, Brasil-bashers, and "Joined:Today" persons too lazy to use the Search function excluded; cry babies too)
|
Posted By: Gringo.Floripa
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 16:43
Originally posted by Dom Pedro
Naturalize and put all your accounts under Brazilian ID. |
That would only work if one then actually renounced their US citizenship. Unless that happens, as far as Tio Sam is concerned, once a US citizen, ALWAYS a US citizen! Meaning, always held liable for taxes, wherever you may live, however you might earn income.
Death and taxes ... ya can't hide (forever). 
------------- I might bark, but I don't bite.
(trolls, sock puppets, Brasil-bashers, and "Joined:Today" persons too lazy to use the Search function excluded; cry babies too)
|
Posted By: DUNGA
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 16:44
Originally posted by sven
Originally posted by DUNGA
As to the 'way', the banks may seem disorganized at the branch management level but I would imagine that the databases are well maintained and up to date. Unfortunately, a data search for for account holders who are also U.S. nationals might be as likely to turn up those with account balances of R$30,000 as R$30,000,000, and turning over a mountain of data (for the IRS to sort out) might be a matter of national pride.Who knows? |
They way (possibility) may be there, but that will never happen. The Receita does not even have the possibility to look into the bank accounts of Brazilians unless they have a court order. Court orders are only possible in case of crimes. CPMF tax was held up for a long time because it allowed the IRS to have a view of what people had in their bank accounts, or at least their spending patterns. |
I believe that the way the doctrine on this actually operates is that the RF can, and does, look at bank information (which most people believe is protected) but can not act on it without a court order. I have read this more than once. Next time I see something about it I will provide a link.
------------- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8hLc_nqx8g - Tales of Brave Ulysses
|
Posted By: Gringo.Floripa
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 16:59
Originally posted by Esprit
We are walking down paranoia boulevard here.  |
Google the phrase "failure to report foreign accounts".
------------- I might bark, but I don't bite.
(trolls, sock puppets, Brasil-bashers, and "Joined:Today" persons too lazy to use the Search function excluded; cry babies too)
|
Posted By: Gaita
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 17:03
US citizens have to report all worldwide earnings, whether they've nationalized or not in another country. The tax break one gets living outside the US is just over $90K, non-taxable so I'm gonna mail the form and hope for the best, but sleep well at night. Reporting only what was in a foreign account on Dec. 31 could be considered tax evasion, just as not reporting would, is the way I read it. It says the "highest amount" during the calendar year, right?
------------- eu acho que sem
|
Posted By: ganeshrkara
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 17:05
Originally posted by Dom Pedro
A country which taxes its citizen on their worldwide income EVEN if they permanently reside abroad (and should have been treated as non-resident for tax purposes by any civilized country) resembles me a medieval slave owner, not a modern XXI century state. |
To me they look more like a Mafia....but better pay the Mafia their 'cut' .....if not full what they are asking for, atleast some part of it...
|
Posted By: Dom Pedro
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 17:23
Originally posted by Gringo.Floripa
Originally posted by Dom Pedro
Naturalize and put all your accounts under Brazilian ID. | That would only work if one then actually renounced their US citizenship. Unless that happens, as far as Tio Sam is concerned, once a US citizen, ALWAYS a US citizen! Meaning, always held liable for taxes, wherever you may live, however you might earn income.Death and taxes ... ya can't hide (forever).  |
Well, first of all not always a US citizen. There is a way to renounce US citizenship. However - if you put your accounts on your brazilian ID, you will be off the list for any agreement Receita could possibly have with IRS, as the account will legitimately belong to a Brazilian citzen. If you want to be bullet-proof, there is an option of changing your name to portuguese sounding, when you naturalize. So if IRS will ask for information of american John Smith nobody will give them the one of a brazilian João Ferreira.
------------- No, I don´t take drugs. My dreams are already scary enough. M.C. Escher
|
Posted By: Esprit
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 17:24
Originally posted by Gringo.Floripa
Originally posted by Esprit
We are walking down paranoia boulevard here.  |
Google the phrase "failure to report foreign accounts".
|
I know, I know - these guys thrive on the fear factor. It's all down to personal thresholds and risk assessment. "He who dares, wins."
------------- Esprit
|
Posted By: Gringo.Floripa
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 17:28
Originally posted by Gaita
US citizens have to report all worldwide earnings, whether they've nationalized or not in another country. The tax break one gets living outside the US is just over $90K, non-taxable so I'm gonna mail the form and hope for the best, but sleep well at night. Reporting only what was in a foreign account on Dec. 31 could be considered tax evasion, just as not reporting would, is the way I read it. It says the "highest amount" during the calendar year, right? |
This is different from the http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/international/article/0,,id=96811,00.html - foreign earned income exclusion . No tax is due on these accounts, they just need to be declared by June 30th of the following fiscal year. That may one day change (the tax issue). When it does, time to put my cash into a coconut plantation! 
Yes, technically it is the "highest amount" during the calendar year. Yet consider: if I have 16 thousand reais on Jan 1st @ a 1.60 rate (10 thousand USD), and then in April, the rate is 1.70 (9,411 USD), then July a 1.50 rate (10,666 USD), then December, we get a blimp to 2.25 (7,111 USD).... Meu Deus no ceu!!! I have to draw the line somewhere. Right or wrong, the amount on 31/12 is what they get from me (and it's usually higher then anyway, because of interest earned throughout the year).
------------- I might bark, but I don't bite.
(trolls, sock puppets, Brasil-bashers, and "Joined:Today" persons too lazy to use the Search function excluded; cry babies too)
|
Posted By: Gringo.Floripa
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 17:31
Originally posted by Esprit
I know, I know - these guys thrive on the fear factor. It's all down to personal thresholds and risk assessment. "He who dares, wins." |
http://articles.cnn.com/2010-12-09/entertainment/snipes.jail_1_tax-returns-charges-of-tax-fraud-tax-protesters?_s=PM:SHOWBIZ - This guy dared , and he lost. 
------------- I might bark, but I don't bite.
(trolls, sock puppets, Brasil-bashers, and "Joined:Today" persons too lazy to use the Search function excluded; cry babies too)
|
Posted By: Dom Pedro
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 17:33
Originally posted by Esprit
Originally posted by Dom Pedro
A country which taxes its citizen on their worldwide income EVEN if they permanently reside abroad (and should have been treated as non-resident for tax purposes by any civilized country) resembles me a medieval slave owner, not a modern XXI century state. |
This is an interesting point. If one has in fact officially changed one´s country of residence despite not having relinquished one´s citizenship of the former country, the issue of taxation would be taken up in one´s adopted country when of course worldwide earnings would be liable to tax. The former country should not be able to levy taxes under such circumstances? |
This is not just an interesting point. This is the only civilized point of view. Very few countries operate this way. Why should a citizen be paying taxes in a country he doesn´t live?
Or even more in a country he might have never lived in! Imagine a foreign born US citizen who never stepped on a US soil, what the heck he would be paying taxes for? For a dubious privilege of holding a US passport?
Even worse, your IRS crocodiles, want to tax worldwide income of US permanent residence for up to 2 years after they left USA for good and abandoned the residency.
C´mon, even KGB was never that ambitious.
------------- No, I don´t take drugs. My dreams are already scary enough. M.C. Escher
|
Posted By: Esprit
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 17:34
Originally posted by Gringo.Floripa
Originally posted by Esprit
I know, I know - these guys thrive on the fear factor. It's all down to personal thresholds and risk assessment. "He who dares, wins." |
http://articles.cnn.com/2010-12-09/entertainment/snipes.jail_1_tax-returns-charges-of-tax-fraud-tax-protesters?_s=PM:SHOWBIZ - This guy dared , and he lost. 
|
Aw, come on. That guy is a high profile in-your-face Hollywood star! Millions were at stake. Besides, he's a dumb as a plank.
------------- Esprit
|
Posted By: Dom Pedro
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 17:39
Originally posted by Gringo.Floripa
Originally posted by Esprit
I know, I know - these guys thrive on the fear factor. It's all down to personal thresholds and risk assessment. "He who dares, wins." | http://articles.cnn.com/2010-12-09/entertainment/snipes.jail_1_tax-returns-charges-of-tax-fraud-tax-protesters?_s=PM:SHOWBIZ - This guy dared , and he lost.  |
Dared what? Not to pay taxes? Buy a forged South African passport? It was not a question whether he will be screwed, but when.He just took his pants off, bended forward and offered IRS a can of mentolated vaseline.
------------- No, I don´t take drugs. My dreams are already scary enough. M.C. Escher
|
Posted By: Gringo.Floripa
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 17:39
Originally posted by Dom Pedro
Very few countries operate this way. Why should a citizen be paying taxes in a country he doesn´t live?
|
As far as I know DP, the US in the ONLY country with such Draconian tax laws. They have to pay for all those wars, somehow.... 
------------- I might bark, but I don't bite.
(trolls, sock puppets, Brasil-bashers, and "Joined:Today" persons too lazy to use the Search function excluded; cry babies too)
|
Posted By: Esprit
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 17:39
Originally posted by Dom Pedro
Originally posted by Esprit
Originally posted by Dom Pedro
A country which taxes its citizen on their worldwide income EVEN if they permanently reside abroad (and should have been treated as non-resident for tax purposes by any civilized country) resembles me a medieval slave owner, not a modern XXI century state. |
This is an interesting point. If one has in fact officially changed one´s country of residence despite not having relinquished one´s citizenship of the former country, the issue of taxation would be taken up in one´s adopted country when of course worldwide earnings would be liable to tax. The former country should not be able to levy taxes under such circumstances? |
This is not just an interesting point. This is the only civilized point of view. Very few countries operate this way. Why should a citizen be paying taxes in a country he doesn´t live?
Or even more in a country he might have never lived in! Imagine a foreign born US citizen who never stepped on a US soil, what the heck he would be paying taxes for? For a dubious privilege of holding a US passport?
Even worse, your IRS crocodiles, want to tax worldwide income of US permanent residence for up to 2 years after they left USA for good and abandoned the residency.
C´mon, even KGB was never that ambitious.
|
I seem to recall something about a tea party in Boston that was all about taxiation and representation? Perhaps a tiny bit of the British heritage still lingers?
------------- Esprit
|
Posted By: Dom Pedro
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 17:42
Originally posted by Gringo.Floripa
They have to pay for all those wars, somehow....  |
Not really. Who finances the wars are the stupid foreign governments and banking institutions who buy US bonds, which have as an only collateral the US budget deficit..
------------- No, I don´t take drugs. My dreams are already scary enough. M.C. Escher
|
Posted By: Gringo.Floripa
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 17:49
Originally posted by Esprit
I seem to recall something about a tea party in Boston that was all about taxiation and representation? Perhaps a tiny bit of the British heritage still lingers? |
Speaking of British heritage, and going completely off-topic, how was the royal wedding Esprit? Did you enjoy your tour abroad? There were rumors floating around the forum that you were actually in Pakistan, helping oversee a "problem resolved". True??? 
------------- I might bark, but I don't bite.
(trolls, sock puppets, Brasil-bashers, and "Joined:Today" persons too lazy to use the Search function excluded; cry babies too)
|
Posted By: sven
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 17:50
Originally posted by DUNGA
I believe that the way the doctrine on this actually operates is that the RF can, and does, look at bank information (which most people believe is protected) but can not act on it without a court order. I have read this more than once. Next time I see something about it I will provide a link. |
That used to happen under CPMF. When the CPMF was kicked, the Receita tried to persuade banks to inform them about operations on bank accounts, in december the STF decided against it:
Os ministros do Supremo Tribunal Federal votaram a favor do Recurso Extraordinário 389808, entendendo que a Receita Federal não pode ter acesso a dados bancários sem prévia decisão judicial.
O caso começou no começo da década, quando a Receita Federal solicitou ao Banco Santander informações sobre as movimentações financeiras da empresa GVA Indústria e Comércio Ltda. Após batalha judicial, o caso foi parar no Supremo, onde este órgão chegou até mesmo a cassar liminar de autoria da GVA para não revelar as informações bancárias deste período por não haver decisão judicial neste sentido.
Assim, o STF volta atrás e reconhece que o sigilo bancário, protegido pela Constituição, só pode ser quebrado na Justiça.
Leia a nota no site do STF.
------------- We live in an age when unnecessary things are our only necessities.
~Oscar Wilde
|
Posted By: Esprit
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 18:50
Originally posted by Gringo.Floripa
Originally posted by Esprit
I seem to recall something about a tea party in Boston that was all about taxiation and representation? Perhaps a tiny bit of the British heritage still lingers? |
Speaking of British heritage, and going completely off-topic, how was the royal wedding Esprit? Did you enjoy your tour abroad? There were rumors floating around the forum that you were actually in Pakistan, helping oversee a "problem resolved". True??? 
|
I must confess to watching the Royal Wedding [ugh!] accidentally for about three seconds before averting my eyes. I admire Her Majesty but the rest of those plonkers can take a long hike on a short pier. Alas, Pakistan wasn’t included on my itinerary this year so that ‘problem’ will persist. Meanwhile Europe, on the surface, seems to function very well and, apart from the miserable temperatures, represents a severe temptation.
------------- Esprit
|
Posted By: Gringo.Floripa
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 19:08
Originally posted by Esprit
Alas, Pakistan wasn’t included on my itinerary this year so that ‘problem’ will persist. Meanwhile Europe, on the surface, seems to function very well and, apart from the miserable temperatures, represents a severe temptation. |
From what I saw on CNN, Sky, etc, the problem in Paki was "terminated". But you're probably right, in that it will "persist". For what it's worth, I'm hearing "temperatures" might rise significantly in Spain this summer. Yet Europe is a big space, so some areas functioning better (calmer) than others (on the surface). I read a comment you posted in another thread about "greener grass". We all have to call it as we see it, not as someone else might, and I do understand your frustration with (the lack of) "ordem e progresso". I feel the same, at least three times per day. Nonetheless, you might want to resist the temptation to head to seemingly more verdant pastures, for just a bit longer.... With all her problems, I still believe Brasil is a very safe place to be.
------------- I might bark, but I don't bite.
(trolls, sock puppets, Brasil-bashers, and "Joined:Today" persons too lazy to use the Search function excluded; cry babies too)
|
Posted By: Steven
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 19:11
|
It took the United States 10 years to find Osama bin Laden. How are they going to find out about my Brazilian bank account?
Up until now I've been filing the noted form because my taxes were handled by a multinational accounting firm at the expense of my company.
Next year, however, I will be doing my own taxes with my $25 copy of Turbo Tax and I have no intention of raising the issue of the handful of Reais generated by my Itaú account that I use to funnel a few Reais to my Brazilian sogro. (Yes, it is over $10K U.S.)
Go ahead and shoot me. Give me Bernie Madoff as a cell mate.
|
Posted By: Gringo.Floripa
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 19:32
Originally posted by Steven
It took the United States 10 years to find Osama bin Laden. |
And there really IS a Santa Claus! 
Originally posted by Steven
How are they going to find out about my Brazilian bank account |
Because they already know: "Up until now I've been filing the noted form because my taxes were
handled by a multinational accounting firm at the expense of my company."
Originally posted by Steven
Next year, however, I will be doing my own taxes with my $25 copy of Turbo Tax and I have no intention of raising the issue of the handful of Reais generated by my Itaú account that I use to funnel a few Reais to my Brazilian sogro. (Yes, it is over $10K U.S.) |
Your call Steven. But when you come to the box on your 1040 to check Yes or No, as to if you have any foreign accounts, the few reais you funnel to your sogra is not part of the equation.
Originally posted by Steven
Give me Bernie Madoff as a cell mate. |
Do you have an address you'd like us to send correspondence to??? ------------- I might bark, but I don't bite.
(trolls, sock puppets, Brasil-bashers, and "Joined:Today" persons too lazy to use the Search function excluded; cry babies too)
|
Posted By: sven
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 19:51
Originally posted by Steven
It took the United States 10 years to find Osama bin Laden. How are they going to find out about my Brazilian bank account?
|
That was the army and not the IRS
------------- We live in an age when unnecessary things are our only necessities.
~Oscar Wilde
|
Posted By: DUNGA
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 20:04
Originally posted by sven
Originally posted by DUNGA
I believe that the way the doctrine on this actually operates is that the RF can, and does, look at bank information (which most people believe is protected) but can not act on it without a court order. I have read this more than once. Next time I see something about it I will provide a link. |
That used to happen under CPMF. When the CPMF was kicked, the Receita tried to persuade banks to inform them about operations on bank accounts, in december the STF decided against it:
Os ministros do Supremo Tribunal Federal votaram a favor do Recurso Extraordinário 389808, entendendo que a Receita Federal não pode ter acesso a dados bancários sem prévia decisão judicial.
[ ... ]
Assim, o STF volta atrás e reconhece que o sigilo bancário, protegido pela Constituição, só pode ser quebrado na Justiça.
Leia a nota no site do STF.
|
I see that decision was in December. I wasn't aware. Good news! I hope it 'sticks'. It has not been that way for the great part of my stay in Brazil.
------------- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8hLc_nqx8g - Tales of Brave Ulysses
|
Posted By: ganeshrkara
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 20:10
|
...Obama is trying to get money from whatever source available to help ease struggling US economy... I read he raised this issue on his recent visit to brasil...
and when he focuss on something he has a way of getting it done.
|
Posted By: Gringo.Floripa
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 20:12
Originally posted by DUNGA
I see that decision was in December. I wasn't aware. Good news! I hope it 'sticks'. |
Can I get an "AMEN!!!"?
STF: My heroes! 
------------- I might bark, but I don't bite.
(trolls, sock puppets, Brasil-bashers, and "Joined:Today" persons too lazy to use the Search function excluded; cry babies too)
|
Posted By: Esprit
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 20:55
Originally posted by ganeshrkara
...Obama is trying to get money from whatever source available to help ease struggling US economy... I read he raised this issue on his recent visit to brasil...
and when he focuss on something he has a way of getting it done. |
All those empty cells at Guantanamo... 
------------- Esprit
|
Posted By: Esprit
Date Posted: 06 June 2011 at 21:03
Originally posted by Gringo.Floripa
I read a comment you posted in another thread about "greener grass". We all have to call it as we see it, not as someone else might, and I do understand your frustration with (the lack of) "ordem e progresso". I feel the same, at least three times per day. Nonetheless, you might want to resist the temptation to head to seemingly more verdant pastures, for just a bit longer.... With all her problems, I still believe Brasil is a very safe place to be.
|
In the broader sense, perhaps Europe should be avoided given the state of play regarding the financial predicaments; the Pound & the Euro, debt, increased taxes, possible default by Greece causing a domino effect along with the austerity programmes that are only now beginning to bite the populations in the ass combined with projected further falls in property values and imported inflation – phew!
------------- Esprit
|
Posted By: ganeshrkara
Date Posted: 07 June 2011 at 14:50
Originally posted by Esprit
Originally posted by ganeshrkara
...Obama is trying to get money from whatever source available to help ease struggling US economy... I read he raised this issue on his recent visit to brasil...
and when he focuss on something he has a way of getting it done. |
All those empty cells at Guantanamo...  |
I was saying the same....news is that Guantanamo lead him to Abottabad.... 
|
Posted By: Steven
Date Posted: 07 June 2011 at 17:21
Originally posted by ganeshrkara
Originally posted by Esprit
Originally posted by ganeshrkara
...Obama is trying to get money from whatever source available to help ease struggling US economy... I read he raised this issue on his recent visit to brasil...
and when he focuss on something he has a way of getting it done. |
All those empty cells at Guantanamo...  |
I was saying the same....news is that Guantanamo lead him to Abottabad....  |
Yes, but with 59% of Americans disapproving of his handling of the economy he might very well find himself in one of those empty cells in Guantanamo.
|
Posted By: Esprit
Date Posted: 07 June 2011 at 20:52
Originally posted by Steven
Originally posted by ganeshrkara
Originally posted by Esprit
Originally posted by ganeshrkara
...Obama is trying to get money from whatever source available to help ease struggling US economy... I read he raised this issue on his recent visit to brasil...
and when he focuss on something he has a way of getting it done. |
All those empty cells at Guantanamo...  |
I was saying the same....news is that Guantanamo lead him to Abottabad....  |
Yes, but with 59% of Americans disapproving of his handling of the economy he might very well find himself in one of those empty cells in Guantanamo. |
I found it quite amusing when, during a TV interview by a sympathising chat show host, Obama was asked to comment about his achievements, and in particular his Presidential election campaign slogans: ‘Hope & change and Yes we can!’ Obama blathered on about his hope for the future and what change he has made [unaffordable health reform]. When pressed about ‘yes we can’ he replied, “Yes we can but...” During the short pause in his reply the audience erupted in laughter and I suspect that the use of little word, but, cost him dearly. He went on to suggest that not everything can be done during one period in office. Guess what – you can only have two terms followed by an autobiography entitled, “I tried to change it but...” This is what happens when a President is elected by lobbyist funding and brilliant oratory.

------------- Esprit
|
Posted By: Steven
Date Posted: 07 June 2011 at 21:39
Originally posted by Esprit
Originally posted by Steven
Originally posted by ganeshrkara
Originally posted by Esprit
Originally posted by ganeshrkara
...Obama is trying to get money from whatever source available to help ease struggling US economy... I read he raised this issue on his recent visit to brasil...
and when he focuss on something he has a way of getting it done. |
All those empty cells at Guantanamo...  |
I was saying the same....news is that Guantanamo lead him to Abottabad....  |
Yes, but with 59% of Americans disapproving of his handling of the economy he might very well find himself in one of those empty cells in Guantanamo. |
I found it quite amusing when, during a TV interview by a sympathising chat show host, Obama was asked to comment about his achievements, and in particular his Presidential election campaign slogans: ‘Hope & change and Yes we can!’ Obama blathered on about his hope for the future and what change he has made [unaffordable health reform]. When pressed about ‘yes we can’ he replied, “Yes we can but...” During the short pause in his reply the audience erupted in laughter and I suspect that the use of little word, but, cost him dearly. He went on to suggest that not everything can be done during one period in office. Guess what – you can only have two terms followed by an autobiography entitled, “I tried to change it but...” This is what happens when a President is elected by lobbyist funding and brilliant oratory.
 |
Through the years I have evolved from my left-wing anti-Viet Nam War student activist days to my current baby boomer worked-hard-all-my-life-ready-to-retire Republican mentality. I suspect that I'm not alone in this transition. So, of course, I am most assuredly biased in my politics and find remarkable comparisons between President Obama and President Clinton in their single-minded attention to public opinion polls.
Say what you want about George Bush but he did what he thought was right.
I'm sorry but I need a leader who leads. Not a guy who gallops after Gallup. I think that the applause Mr. Obama receives on his global sojurns is reflective of the benefits that his audience perceives they will receive based on his pursuit of the carrot of public opinion. I'm ready for some "Hope and Change and Yes We Can!" Time for a new guy.
|
Posted By: Esprit
Date Posted: 07 June 2011 at 22:10
Originally posted by Steven
Originally posted by Esprit
Originally posted by Steven
Originally posted by ganeshrkara
Originally posted by Esprit
Originally posted by ganeshrkara
...Obama is trying to get money from whatever source available to help ease struggling US economy... I read he raised this issue on his recent visit to brasil...
and when he focuss on something he has a way of getting it done. |
All those empty cells at Guantanamo...  |
I was saying the same....news is that Guantanamo lead him to Abottabad....  |
Yes, but with 59% of Americans disapproving of his handling of the economy he might very well find himself in one of those empty cells in Guantanamo. |
I found it quite amusing when, during a TV interview by a sympathising chat show host, Obama was asked to comment about his achievements, and in particular his Presidential election campaign slogans: ‘Hope & change and Yes we can!’ Obama blathered on about his hope for the future and what change he has made [unaffordable health reform]. When pressed about ‘yes we can’ he replied, “Yes we can but...” During the short pause in his reply the audience erupted in laughter and I suspect that the use of little word, but, cost him dearly. He went on to suggest that not everything can be done during one period in office. Guess what – you can only have two terms followed by an autobiography entitled, “I tried to change it but...” This is what happens when a President is elected by lobbyist funding and brilliant oratory.
 |
Through the years I have evolved from my left-wing anti-Viet Nam War student activist days to my current baby boomer worked-hard-all-my-life-ready-to-retire Republican mentality. I suspect that I'm not alone in this transition. So, of course, I am most assuredly biased in my politics and find remarkable comparisons between President Obama and President Clinton in their single-minded attention to public opinion polls.
Say what you want about George Bush but he did what he thought was right.
I'm sorry but I need a leader who leads. Not a guy who gallops after Gallup. I think that the applause Mr. Obama receives on his global sojurns is reflective of the benefits that his audience perceives they will receive based on his pursuit of the carrot of public opinion. I'm ready for some "Hope and Change and Yes We Can!" Time for a new guy. |
I wouldn’t hold out any hope for change in the absence of something extraordinary and traumatic happening on the global stage: the second coming or perhaps captain Kirk revisiting earth via a time warp. The political machinery in entrenched in a club comprising the oligarchy represented by the lobbyists aided by the rabid media and the collective idiot, the electorate. This is evidenced by the people offered up for election; squeaky clean money-wise and bedroom-wise, good looking, never inhaled, well spoken, believes in God, has never masturbated and politically correct in all things. Is it possible that there is such a person with the necessary leadership skills?
------------- Esprit
|
Posted By: Dom Pedro
Date Posted: 07 June 2011 at 22:20
Originally posted by Steven
Through the years I have evolved from my left-wing anti-Viet Nam War student activist days to my current baby boomer worked-hard-all-my-life-ready-to-retire Republican mentality. I suspect that I'm not alone in this transition. |
Any man who is under 30, and is not a liberal, has no heart; and any man who is over 30, and is not a conservative, has no brains. (C) Sir Winston Churchill
------------- No, I don´t take drugs. My dreams are already scary enough. M.C. Escher
|
Posted By: BorisG
Date Posted: 08 June 2011 at 00:12
Originally posted by Dom Pedro
Any man who is under 30, and is not a liberal, has no heart; and any man who is over 30, and is not a conservative, has no brains. (C) Sir Winston Churchill
|
Amen. My favorite of Sr. Winston´s many pearls is the following:
"The main vice of capitalism is the uneven distribution of prosperity. The main vice of socialism is the even distribution of misery."
|
Posted By: Gringo.Floripa
Date Posted: 08 June 2011 at 08:39
Most (US) Americans don't realize they are being subjected to the good cop/bad cop psyop. For Steven, Bush was the good cop, for me, Bush was definitely the bad cop, and vice-versa for Obama (though good cop is no longer my opinion of him). Nonetheless, both cops report to the same hierarchy. It's quite evident this hierarchy has launched a well-crafted divide/conquer/enslave campaign, which seems to be succeeding. I have never seen my fellow countrymen so bitterly divided as now.
------------- I might bark, but I don't bite.
(trolls, sock puppets, Brasil-bashers, and "Joined:Today" persons too lazy to use the Search function excluded; cry babies too)
|
Posted By: Steven
Date Posted: 08 June 2011 at 09:47
Originally posted by Gringo.Floripa
Most (US) Americans don't realize they are being subjected to the good cop/bad cop psyop. For Steven, Bush was the good cop, for me, Bush was definitely the bad cop, and vice-versa for Obama (though good cop is no longer my opinion of him). Nonetheless, both cops report to the same hierarchy. It's quite evident this hierarchy has launched a well-crafted divide/conquer/enslave campaign, which seems to be succeeding. I have never seen my fellow countrymen so bitterly divided as now.
|
I only think that he was good in the sense that he was more principled than Mr. Obama. I'm not real happy with some of the things that Mr. Bush accomplished during his tenure so I wouldn't really call him a good cop.
As far as the divide/conquer/enslave campaign - you might be overstating the situation a little bit but there's no doubt that you need to belong to the "old boys club" to get elected and make the deals needed to govern. All politicians would stick a shiv in their own mother's backs if it helped them get elected.
|
Posted By: sven
Date Posted: 08 June 2011 at 09:50
Originally posted by BorisG
"The main vice of capitalism is the uneven distribution of prosperity. The main vice of socialism is the even distribution of misery." |
Then he must have confused socialism with communism.
------------- We live in an age when unnecessary things are our only necessities.
~Oscar Wilde
|
Posted By: sven
Date Posted: 08 June 2011 at 09:58
Originally posted by Gringo.Floripa
Bush was definitely the bad cop |
You mean the stupid cop:
"I believe men and fish can live together in peace"
Originally posted by Gringo.Floripa
Nonetheless, both cops report to the same hierarchy. It's quite evident this hierarchy has launched a well-crafted divide/conquer/enslave campaign, which seems to be succeeding. I have never seen my fellow countrymen so bitterly divided as now.
|
That's bacause you lack a real democracy. Let's face it, two parties, and both ar in the pocket of big farmaceuticals, the arms industry, tobaco and so on. Elections are won on issues like "abortion" and "family values" and not on real political issues.
------------- We live in an age when unnecessary things are our only necessities.
~Oscar Wilde
|
Posted By: Gringo.Floripa
Date Posted: 08 June 2011 at 10:07
Originally posted by sven
Elections are won on issues like "abortion" and "family values" and not on real political issues.
|
Elections aren't "won" in the US, they are predetermined, at least where office of President is concerned (antiquated electoral college concept, not popular vote). The citizen's "participation" in democracy is an illusion when it comes to electing someone to the highest office in the land, and the Presidential campaigns and debates not much different from the dog and pony show at the circus. Every circus needs a clown, so this time around we have Sarah Palin as part of the entertainment.
------------- I might bark, but I don't bite.
(trolls, sock puppets, Brasil-bashers, and "Joined:Today" persons too lazy to use the Search function excluded; cry babies too)
|
Posted By: sven
Date Posted: 08 June 2011 at 11:07
Originally posted by Gringo.Floripa
Originally posted by sven
Elections are won on issues like "abortion" and "family values" and not on real political issues.
| Elections aren't "won" in the US, they are predetermined, at least where office of President is concerned (antiquated electoral college concept, not popular vote). The citizen's "participation" in democracy is an illusion when it comes to electing someone to the highest office in the land, and the Presidential campaigns and debates not much different from the dog and pony show at the circus. Every circus needs a clown, so this time around we have Sarah Palin as part of the entertainment. |
Party members don't even get a vote on who the party candidate will be. They elect delegates that elect the candidate, but these delegates are not bound by the vote of the people that elected them in the first place.
The electoral college concept was great in the age it was constituted in the US. Imagine having a direct ballot in the early 1800's. But now, it's ripe for the Smithsonian, as is, IMHO, most of the American constitution.
I mean, two parties, come on. That's dangerously close to one party only.
------------- We live in an age when unnecessary things are our only necessities.
~Oscar Wilde
|
Posted By: Gringo.Floripa
Date Posted: 08 June 2011 at 11:24
Originally posted by sven
I mean, two parties, come on. That's dangerously close to one party only. |
Exactly! Two sides of the same coin.
Yet the real mystery is, who owns that coin?!?
------------- I might bark, but I don't bite.
(trolls, sock puppets, Brasil-bashers, and "Joined:Today" persons too lazy to use the Search function excluded; cry babies too)
|
Posted By: Gringo.Floripa
Date Posted: 08 June 2011 at 18:47
Is it sychronicity, or just coincidence? Who knows...? Happened to read this article today: http://www.sovereignman.com - US government shaking down dual national foreigners It coincides with, even confirms what was the content of the original post of this thread. For those who might click the link above days, weeks, or months after today, you want to look for the article dated June 8, 2011.
Scary stuff!!! 
------------- I might bark, but I don't bite.
(trolls, sock puppets, Brasil-bashers, and "Joined:Today" persons too lazy to use the Search function excluded; cry babies too)
|
Posted By: Dom Pedro
Date Posted: 08 June 2011 at 19:34
Originally posted by Gringo.Floripa
Originally posted by sven
I mean, two parties, come on. That's dangerously close to one party only. | Exactly! Two sides of the same coin.Yet the real mystery is, who owns that coin?!? |
ET
------------- No, I don´t take drugs. My dreams are already scary enough. M.C. Escher
|
Posted By: Gringo.Floripa
Date Posted: 08 June 2011 at 19:44
Originally posted by Dom Pedro
ET |
But which ones DP? Greys, Reptilians, Nephilim? Maybe it's the Klingons, or quite possibly the Borg. "Resistance is futile" 
------------- I might bark, but I don't bite.
(trolls, sock puppets, Brasil-bashers, and "Joined:Today" persons too lazy to use the Search function excluded; cry babies too)
|
Posted By: Kalle Anka
Date Posted: 08 June 2011 at 19:46
Originally posted by sven
I mean, two parties, come on. That's dangerously close to one party only. |
Originally posted by Sven
Exactly! Two sides of the same coin.Yet the real mystery is, who owns that coin?!?
It could be ET but who is the CFR, as in Council on Foreign Relations?
|
Posted By: Kalle Anka
Date Posted: 08 June 2011 at 19:50
member_profile.asp?PF=6925&FID=21 - Gringo.Floripa posted Scary stuff!!! 
Well, they've always been scary. Can't change that. Switch to decalf might help?
|
Posted By: Gringo.Floripa
Date Posted: 08 June 2011 at 20:29
Originally posted by Kalle Anka
It could be ET but who is the CFR, as in Council on Foreign Relations? |
They might just lock me away as a crazy, for talking about aliens, but you've hit a home run Kalle. You might want to start working on an alternate identity!  I've long suspected this site is actually run by the CIA (the server for this site is in the US, in case anyone didn't know). I mean, why pay to have operatives to go live in another country, to gather facts, when you can have a bunch of expats blathering about the internal affairs of a country, as well as "homeland" issues on the Internet. What a data farm!
Hey... a black Suburban with tinted windows just pulled up in front of my house! Gotta go.... 
------------- I might bark, but I don't bite.
(trolls, sock puppets, Brasil-bashers, and "Joined:Today" persons too lazy to use the Search function excluded; cry babies too)
|
Posted By: Esprit
Date Posted: 08 June 2011 at 22:11
|
Professional politicians need no introduction as their universal ways are well known. If a two party system is dangerously close to a one party system, certainly a multi party system has shown itself to be a recipe for the chaos of coalition compromise governance. Such management in a restaurant kitchen would result in a single plate comprising, stew and ice-cream tossed in a salad. Another current example of such chaos is the appalling turmoil in Portugal and Greece and, of course, the corruption in Brazil. In the final analysis we, as individuals, have to learn to manipulate the world as it presents itself; if you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em. The alternative is to fill in those tax forms diligently, convince yourself that the husbandry of your tax money is for the greater good and that Jesus loves you.
------------- Esprit
|
Posted By: Steven
Date Posted: 08 June 2011 at 23:11
Originally posted by Esprit
Professional politicians need no introduction as their universal ways are well known. If a two party system is dangerously close to a one party system, certainly a multi party system has shown itself to be a recipe for the chaos of coalition compromise governance. Such management in a restaurant kitchen would result in a single plate comprising, stew and ice-cream tossed in a salad. Another current example of such chaos is the appalling turmoil in Portugal and Greece and, of course, the corruption in Brazil. In the final analysis we, as individuals, have to learn to manipulate the world as it presents itself; if you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em. The alternative is to fill in those tax forms diligently, convince yourself that the husbandry of your tax money is for the greater good and that Jesus loves you. |
Sorry, but you had me until the end. Jesus really does love me.
|
Posted By: Esprit
Date Posted: 08 June 2011 at 23:34
Originally posted by Steven
Originally posted by Esprit
Professional politicians need no introduction as their universal ways are well known. If a two party system is dangerously close to a one party system, certainly a multi party system has shown itself to be a recipe for the chaos of coalition compromise governance. Such management in a restaurant kitchen would result in a single plate comprising, stew and ice-cream tossed in a salad. Another current example of such chaos is the appalling turmoil in Portugal and Greece and, of course, the corruption in Brazil. In the final analysis we, as individuals, have to learn to manipulate the world as it presents itself; if you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em. The alternative is to fill in those tax forms diligently, convince yourself that the husbandry of your tax money is for the greater good and that Jesus loves you. |
Sorry, but you had me until the end. Jesus really does love me. |
Well that’s great news – pity though that He’s so selective. 
------------- Esprit
|
Posted By: Gringo.Floripa
Date Posted: 09 June 2011 at 08:55
So then… after lots of fun banter yesterday/last night about aliens, conspiracies, dysfunctional political systems, and a brief soliloquy about the agape form of love, time to get this thread back on track….
The three links below, might be of interest for any US citizens living in Brasil, who have bank accounts in Brasil, with a aggregate value of ten thousand USD, or more. You have until June 30th to file your FBAR. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304563104576363650392836000.html?mod=WSJ_article_RecentColumns_WeekendInvestor - IRS Issues New Guidelines For Overseas Accounts
http://www.sovereignman.com - US government shaking down dual national foreigners (see article dated June 8th, if the link directs you to the main page)
http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=148849,00.html - Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR)
------------- I might bark, but I don't bite.
(trolls, sock puppets, Brasil-bashers, and "Joined:Today" persons too lazy to use the Search function excluded; cry babies too)
|
Posted By: Esprit
Date Posted: 09 June 2011 at 11:18
|
I remember, when a boy, the wonderful feeling of relief when leaving the Catholic confessional; my soul was free of sin and guilt. Now that I am a man I have put these childish things behind me. Indoctrination has been replaced by rational thought.
It is said that the perfect man falls seven times daily; the perfect man being Jesus. The saying refers to sins of thought, word and deed. In addition, and in these enlightened times, apparently there is now another and additional sin; the sin of omission. Omission to tell the IRS about taxed income earned beyond US shores by people living permanently offshore who, whilst enjoying the theoretical privileges and protection afforded every US citizen, must pay tax because of their birthright.
Such privileges were no doubt handy during the final evacuation from Saigon and other debacles throughout US history of intervention and escapades on foreign shores. It could be argued that somebody must pay for the helicopter gasoline. Yet not to be frivolous, it should be recognised that US citizenship is a privilege and as such this may be regarded as a form of representation that justifies taxation; however unfair that may seem.
In common with what was once a naive young boy, the motive to confess sins where spurred by the fear of the wrath of God and a eternity of fire and brimstone and I can’t help making the comparison between God’s threat of punishment with that of the IRS; heavy fines and imprisonment – the same fear factor that drives the Church’s phenomenal financial success and the IRS collection agency that attempts to feed the irresponsible excesses of government spending.
Maybe I’ll spend eternity in the agonies of fire and maybe the taxman will eventually grab my coattails. I know the relief of confession and I know the benefits of spending my own hard earned money as I think fit: I’ve made that choice. The only downside to nonconformity is the occasional cold sweat when my head hits the pillow and I think, what if... Dirty Harry’s words echo, “Do you feel lucky? Well do ya...punk?”
------------- Esprit
|
Posted By: Gaita
Date Posted: 09 June 2011 at 11:36
This is not the IRS asking for the info, but rather the Treasury Dept. Maybe the same pockets eventually.
------------- eu acho que sem
|
Posted By: Gringo.Floripa
Date Posted: 09 June 2011 at 12:29
Esprit, the wrath of God is in the life to come (for some). The wrath of the IRS is in the here and now.
Most police in the UK don't carry weapons. Most police in the US are armed just as well, if not better, than the soldiers sent to Iraq & Afghanistan. The British Tax Authority might be of the same benign nature as the Bobbies. Not so with the IRS.
Since the infamous Patriot Act went into effect, when one goes to renew their US passport, a cross-check is done with the IRS. Have some years you failed to file your return? Have unpaid taxes? Your passport renewal could be denied. Everyone needs to make their own decision about what rules and regulations they will comply with, or not. IMO, the risk, in this situation, is far too grave to ignore, and as much as I'd like to tell them to shove it, it's none of their business, I'll send in the bloody form, and sleep well at night....
@ Gaita: The IRS is merely the "collection agency" for the Treasury Dept. The money they rake in, is then provided to the TD to "run" the country. But with Ben's printers running 24/7, why mess with you and me, eh?! 
------------- I might bark, but I don't bite.
(trolls, sock puppets, Brasil-bashers, and "Joined:Today" persons too lazy to use the Search function excluded; cry babies too)
|
Posted By: Esprit
Date Posted: 09 June 2011 at 13:23
|
I can assure you, given the fact that when the indigenous North Americans were hunting buffalo and painting their asses blue, the English had a taxation system in being. Today’s Inland Revenue and Customs & Excise would be the envy of the Gestapo in other times; draconian. Run by hoards of the otherwise unemployable, they feed off everything, including dandruff flakes and anything else they can get their hands on. Left wing and underpaid to a man, they regard themselves as the down trodden poor entitled to the ‘rights.’ They are the ‘us’ in the ‘them & us’ scenario. Trust me, I know the breed.
The unpaid taxes you mention are not part of this discussion. Unpaid taxes are something that the authorities have already levied based upon their information submitted by either the tax payer or by an assessment they have made based on assumption formed by other information. It’s game over when they know everything about you. The more they know, the more they will follow the scent of blood. They are an insatiable blood sucking sub-human species best avoided.
------------- Esprit
|
Posted By: Gringo.Floripa
Date Posted: 09 June 2011 at 13:51
Originally posted by Esprit
The unpaid taxes you mention are not part of this discussion. Unpaid taxes are something that the authorities have already levied based upon their information submitted by either the tax payer or by an assessment they have made based on assumption formed by other information. It’s game over when they know everything about you. The more they know, the more they will follow the scent of blood. They are an insatiable blood sucking sub-human species best avoided. |
This is true Esprit. Yet the IRS and Treasury Dept are just different tentacles of the same Leviathan. The point is, the databases are more and more intertwined, and what I detailed about passport renewal is what is known. Certainly there are other "checks" performed, or could be in the near future, which the public is not aware of. As the article in the WSJ explained, sometime later this year, the window for compliance of reporting foreign bank accounts will be shut. As to what begins afterward, is anyone's guess.
I already have a great disdain and discomfort with the grilling I sometimes receive by US Immigration as to the amount of time of my absence from the country, and the reason(s) why. It's truly not a far stretch of the imagination that in the not too distant future, for one to be asked (whose travel record reveals more than a two week holiday per year abroad), "Do you happen to have any bank accounts in the country you just visited?" (Gulp!) As you stated, "Trust me, I know the breed". Like you, I don't trust them as far as I can spit.
Also, if anyone has ever done a sizable transfer from a US bank to a BR bank, well, they already know about the account's existence. By playing the omission game, one is certainly hoisting up a red flag. I've filed an FBAR for the past six years thus far, and have never
received any official communication or tax notices about them. I
didn't even know about this amnesty until I read http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304563104576363650392836000.html?mod=WSJ_article_RecentColumns_WeekendInvestor - the WSJ article the
other day, so thought I'd pass it on, for those who are unaware. Each one needs to make their own decision....
------------- I might bark, but I don't bite.
(trolls, sock puppets, Brasil-bashers, and "Joined:Today" persons too lazy to use the Search function excluded; cry babies too)
|
Posted By: DUNGA
Date Posted: 09 June 2011 at 14:35
I sense some irony, or perhaps a disconnect, reading the posts on this thread. I guess our resident (in Brazil) pundits choose to ignore the fact that Banco Central requires filing of a declaration of http://www4.bcb.gov.br/rex/cbe/port/default.asp - Capitais Brasileiros no Exterior . While the exemption is a more reasonable US$100,000, it is not limited to accounts and includes virtually all assets. There are http://www.portaldecontabilidade.com.br/noticias/declaracaobensexterior.htm - associated penalties as well. Let's not forget that the required reporting of assets on the DIRPF (required by anyone with a decent* legal income) are onerous even by U.S. standards. I guess some people have chosen the wrong country to live in or are having some trouble adjusting to the times. And by the way the FBAR comes out of the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970, hardly the work of Obama.
*no offense to the monks among us
------------- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8hLc_nqx8g - Tales of Brave Ulysses
|
Posted By: sven
Date Posted: 09 June 2011 at 14:44
Originally posted by Gringo.Floripa
the window for compliance of reporting foreign bank accounts will be shut.
I already have a great disdain and discomfort with the grilling I sometimes receive by US Immigration as to the amount of time of my absence from the country,
It's truly not a far stretch (...) for one to be asked (whose travel record reveals more than a two week holiday per year abroad), "Do you happen to have any bank accounts in the country you just visited?"
|
So it is indeed "the land of the free"
------------- We live in an age when unnecessary things are our only necessities.
~Oscar Wilde
|
Posted By: Esprit
Date Posted: 09 June 2011 at 15:36
What is freedom? 
------------- Esprit
|
Posted By: Gringo.Floripa
Date Posted: 09 June 2011 at 16:33
Originally posted by Esprit
What is freedom?  |
Freedom to vote-off whoever you wish, from American Idol! 
------------- I might bark, but I don't bite.
(trolls, sock puppets, Brasil-bashers, and "Joined:Today" persons too lazy to use the Search function excluded; cry babies too)
|
Posted By: sven
Date Posted: 09 June 2011 at 16:53
Originally posted by Esprit
What is freedom?  |
Freedom is when you can call your president a moron without becoming a member of the FBI most wanted list and have your name put on the "no fly list".
It's the right to disagree with the current ruler, one of those things a couple of "founding fathers"had in mind
------------- We live in an age when unnecessary things are our only necessities.
~Oscar Wilde
|
Posted By: Esprit
Date Posted: 09 June 2011 at 16:53
The call is free?
------------- Esprit
|
Posted By: Gringo.Floripa
Date Posted: 09 June 2011 at 16:56
Originally posted by Esprit
The call is free? |
1-800-WE-KNOW-WHEREULIVE
------------- I might bark, but I don't bite.
(trolls, sock puppets, Brasil-bashers, and "Joined:Today" persons too lazy to use the Search function excluded; cry babies too)
|
Posted By: Esprit
Date Posted: 09 June 2011 at 16:59
Obama is/was an America idol.
------------- Esprit
|
Posted By: Gringo.Floripa
Date Posted: 09 June 2011 at 17:06
Originally posted by sven
Freedom is when you can call your president a moron without becoming a member of the FBI most wanted list and have your name put on the "no fly list".
|
Except for when the country is "at war" (which it is, more often, than not).
EDIT: Though "safe" for now, in 2007, the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act ( http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=s110-1959 - Senate Bill 1959 ) could have allowed the U.S. government to arrest and incarcerate any individual
who speaks out against the (Bush/Obama/Whoever) Administration, the war (on Iraq/Afghanistan), the
Department of Homeland Security or any government agency (including the
FDA).
------------- I might bark, but I don't bite.
(trolls, sock puppets, Brasil-bashers, and "Joined:Today" persons too lazy to use the Search function excluded; cry babies too)
|
Posted By: sven
Date Posted: 09 June 2011 at 18:20
Originally posted by Esprit
Obama is/was an America idol. |
Was he in there to win?
------------- We live in an age when unnecessary things are our only necessities.
~Oscar Wilde
|
Posted By: sven
Date Posted: 09 June 2011 at 18:22
Originally posted by Gringo.Floripa
Originally posted by sven
Freedom is when you can call your president a moron without becoming a member of the FBI most wanted list and have your name put on the "no fly list".
| Except for when the country is "at war" (which it is, more often, than not). EDIT: Though "safe" for now, in 2007, the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act ( http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=s110-1959 - Senate Bill 1959 ) could have allowed the U.S. government to arrest and incarcerate any individual
who speaks out against the (Bush/Obama/Whoever) Administration, the war (on Iraq/Afghanistan), the
Department of Homeland Security or any government agency (including the
FDA).<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); text-align: left; text-decoration: none; border: medium none;"> |
I think it's time for tea. Let's have a tea party...
------------- We live in an age when unnecessary things are our only necessities.
~Oscar Wilde
|
Posted By: Gringo.Floripa
Date Posted: 09 June 2011 at 20:23
Though the deadlines listed in this article are now redundant, the rest is (unfortunately) spot on.
http://www.forbes.com/2010/07/26/offshore-bank-accounts-irs-ubs-fbars-personal-finance-robert-wood.html - Ten Things To Know About Offshore Bank Accounts The updated closure date for the present Voluntary Disclosure Program is August 31st.
The last day to file a FBAR regarding accounts you had in 2010, is June 30th.
------------- I might bark, but I don't bite.
(trolls, sock puppets, Brasil-bashers, and "Joined:Today" persons too lazy to use the Search function excluded; cry babies too)
|
Posted By: Esprit
Date Posted: 09 June 2011 at 23:08
Originally posted by Gringo.Floripa
Though the deadlines listed in this article are now redundant, the rest is (unfortunately) spot on.
http://www.forbes.com/2010/07/26/offshore-bank-accounts-irs-ubs-fbars-personal-finance-robert-wood.html - Ten Things To Know About Offshore Bank Accounts The updated closure date for the present Voluntary Disclosure Program is August 31st.
The last day to file a FBAR regarding accounts you had in 2010, is June 30th.
|
The smug looking Mr. Wood has a vested interest in all of this and is probably a cocktail crony plea bargainer with the suits at the IRS in this game of hide & seek the errant tax dodging millionaire. While I’m certain that he’s factually correct, I’m equally certain that he would be an excellent bedtime ghost story teller with the ability frighten the living daylights out of his little grandchildren. “Oh please Mr. Wood...please take on my case in one of your nationwide practices...I’ll be glad to pay you 30%...for God’s sake just keep me out of prison!”
GF you’ve managed to trawl up a magnificent list of propaganda links that suggests the IRS have limited resources and access to banking information thereby resorting to quite frightening bullyboy threats. We should know what is right from wrong through our innate senses which include fairness and justice. Laws come and go, yet fairness and justice remain steadfast in all things. The accidental location of one’s birth should not bring about a lifelong obligation to file full disclosure and tax returns to a country wherein one doesn’t reside; this is neither fair nor just least reasonable. A jury trial would clear this nonsense up in an instant; all of which is neither here nor there because the law is the law and its eager proponents are as blind as Justice herself. Breaking this law is a matter of risk assessment for each individual and their tolerance of risk. Any investor will tell you that the higher the risk, the higher the return. Audacity is achieved incrementally by each risk taken. Should we baulk when a toe is dipped in chill waters we’ll never get to swim. Indeed equally we’ll never drown. He who dares, wins
------------- Esprit
|
Posted By: Gringo.Floripa
Date Posted: 10 June 2011 at 08:59
Originally posted by Esprit
He who dares, wins |
And such is the belief a casino hopes each gambler embraces.
Ah Esprit, I'm so glad you're back from your European holiday! Your wit and sarcasm have been missed. I'm being sincere.
I'm also being sincere by saying, all that you said, is easy to say… by someone who is not a US citizen. Again, each person (to which this applies) needs to make their own decision about whether or not to submit an FBAR. I think we all know now what you would decide.
You also state Esprit, "Laws come and go, yet fairness and justice remain steadfast in all things". But isn't truthfulness part of that equation???
------------- I might bark, but I don't bite.
(trolls, sock puppets, Brasil-bashers, and "Joined:Today" persons too lazy to use the Search function excluded; cry babies too)
|
Posted By: Esprit
Date Posted: 10 June 2011 at 09:41
|
Truthfulness. President Clinton springs to mind. “I did not have sexual relations with that woman...” The pedantic Mr. Clinton feigned disagreement that it is fallacious to consider fellatio a sexual activity. Okay, so he lied. Hell, his wife was listening!
Sometimes the truth can hurt when its consequences have an unjust result. Admittedly he didn’t break any laws. And even if there was a law against this rather pleasurable activity it would be an unjust law as is the law under discussion. Rules are made for the strict adherence by fools and the guidance of wise men. What should a person of a certain faith answer when asked by the Gestapo, “Are you Jewish?” Truth can be flexible.
------------- Esprit
|
Posted By: DUNGA
Date Posted: 10 June 2011 at 13:02
@Gringo.Floripa; I am glad you have made the effort to post the warnings on the FBAR. I have been fretting about this and had planned to do something about it while on this current extended trip to CA, but almost let it slip between the cracks again. It is interesting to note that one of the first things that new immigrant posters want to know about is opening a bank account. Next is how to transfer a large sum of money into that account to buy a house (rather than directly to the seller). U.S. citizens should at least be aware of this filing requirement at this point and make it part of their personal calculus. Flying low on the radar can be part and parcel of a simple, relaxed, life style. Flying below tree-top level is high stress. Why beat yourself up?
------------- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8hLc_nqx8g - Tales of Brave Ulysses
|
Posted By: Esprit
Date Posted: 10 June 2011 at 13:30
|
Dunga is of course right. A large influx of offshore account holders filing is the best thing for those who have the stomach to continue to fly under the radar. The IRS may take the law of diminishing returns into consideration and not bother to scour the planet in an abortive attempt to rectify America’s disastrous deficit. Such petty cash gleaned from hardworking honest folk just might placate IRS frustration and turn opinion, through awareness, to focus on the real villains in this farce; the spendthrift Congress and their cronies.
------------- Esprit
|
Posted By: DUNGA
Date Posted: 10 June 2011 at 13:44
Filing the FBAR doesn't cost a cent.
------------- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8hLc_nqx8g - Tales of Brave Ulysses
|
Posted By: Gringo.Floripa
Date Posted: 10 June 2011 at 14:01
@Dunga: Towards the end of the Forbes article,"Ten Things to Know..." it states: "Even though FBAR penalties are big, there have been some indications the
IRS may not be pushing them too hard. If you don't file a pile of old
FBARs, perhaps it won't be obvious you didn't file in the past? A tax
lawyer cannot recommend this, but some clients are probably choosing not
to file old FBARs."
I cannot recommend either what someone should do, but for what it's worth, I had accounts which should have been reported prior to my learning about the FBAR. I did not back file anything. I just started from that moment, to begin to file every year from then on. I've yet to receive any sort of inquiry about other years.
A point to remember, if one requests an extension to file their 1040 (Oct 15th being the cutoff date), the FBAR is still due by June 30th.
------------- I might bark, but I don't bite.
(trolls, sock puppets, Brasil-bashers, and "Joined:Today" persons too lazy to use the Search function excluded; cry babies too)
|
Posted By: DUNGA
Date Posted: 10 June 2011 at 14:44
Originally posted by Gringo.Floripa
A point tght make a recon o remember, if one requests an extension to file their 1040 (Oct 15th being the cutoff date), the FBAR is still due by June 30th. | A point further, the FBAR has to be received by June 30th, not just postmarked like a normal tax filing. And yes I believe the extension on the 1040 is automaticly accepted (attach a note) if you are outside the U.S.
I may make a recon foray to the IRS feild office next week ... ask some questions for that friend of mine in Brazil ...
------------- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8hLc_nqx8g - Tales of Brave Ulysses
|
Posted By: Gringo.Floripa
Date Posted: 10 June 2011 at 15:31
Originally posted by DUNGA
A point further, the FBAR has to be received by June 30th, not just postmarked like a normal tax filing. And yes I believe the extension on the 1040 is automaticly accepted (attach a note) if you are outside the U.S. |
Yes, good to clarify the "must-be-received-by" date of June 30th for the FBAR! Meaning, any US gringo living in Brasil, who intends to file an FBAR, should have it in the mail within the next week or so. If mailing the form from Brasil,
best to utilize FedEx, DHL, or a similar secure express carrier, and NOT just drop it in the correio.
Though I doubt anyone would know what it is, probably not the smartest
idea to have a form listing your Brasilian bank accounts, with their amounts, floating around
in Brasil!
Regarding one's 1040, an automatic two month extension, is indeed applied, if one is living out of the country, and as Dunga pointed out, a note is also attached to your tax form. Yet for the 6 month extension-Oct deadline, one needs to request that either by mail or electronically prior to 15/04.
See this link for more detailed info: http://www.irs.gov/publications/p54/index.html - Publication 54 (2010), Tax Guide for U.S. Citizens and Resident Aliens Abroad
One can also download http://turbotax.intuit.com/tax-tools/tax-tips/Efile/Filing-an-Income-Tax-Extension/INF12040.html - a pdf file here . Scroll down to the If you live outside the United States section.
------------- I might bark, but I don't bite.
(trolls, sock puppets, Brasil-bashers, and "Joined:Today" persons too lazy to use the Search function excluded; cry babies too)
|
Posted By: Gringo.Floripa
Date Posted: 25 June 2011 at 09:55
Thought I'd give this thread one last bump into the active stream, in case any US gringos (to whom this might apply) have not signed in to the forum for awhile, and are unaware of this requirement. Best to start Oldest message first, to get the gist of the thread.
The FBAR must be received by next Thurs, June 30th (not simply postmarked 30/06). Meaning, at latest, you'll want to stop by FedEx or DHL on Monday.
Bom fim de semana!
------------- I might bark, but I don't bite.
(trolls, sock puppets, Brasil-bashers, and "Joined:Today" persons too lazy to use the Search function excluded; cry babies too)
|
|