![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Vent Your Frustrations | |
| |
|
| << Prev Page of 11 Next >> |
| Author | Message | |
|
man of leisure
Gringoes.com Guru
Joined: 22 January 2008 Location: Brazil Online Status: Online Posts: 2974 |
![]() Posted: 17 August 2012 at 12:12 |
|
|
I do realise that Sven, I was being sarcastic. However, despite the fine words of the law, they are continually overlooked or disregarded. You must know more about this than most and its implementation is perhaps only with regard to public utilities. My schools fees increased by 20% and the only evidence they provided was the invoice with a demand for payment within the stipulated prazo. Of course, I'm not obliged to keep my kids in that school but I choose to do so!
Edited by man of leisure - 17 August 2012 at 12:15 |
||
IP Logged |
||
|
Amsterdam
Senior Member
Joined: 02 March 2012 Location: Brazil Online Status: Offline Posts: 1074 |
![]() Posted: 17 August 2012 at 12:17 |
|
|
Edited by Amsterdam - 27 August 2012 at 22:46 |
||
IP Logged |
||
|
Gringo.Floripa
Gringoes.com Guru
Joined: 17 June 2010 Location: Brazil Online Status: Offline Posts: 4510 |
![]() Posted: 17 August 2012 at 12:21 |
|
|
"Writing about the Brazil of a century ago, Warren Dean, an economic historian, noted that the country’s foreign trade 'appears to have been limited to commodities in which overwhelming comparative advantage offset high costs of production and commercialisation and high internal taxes.' Both government and private sector paid 'little attention to…competitiveness,' he added." Article continues here: A moment of truth for Dilma EDIT: A link in article above: http://www.economist.com/node/21560565 Edited by Gringo.Floripa - 17 August 2012 at 12:26 |
||
|
I might bark, but I don't bite.
(trolls, sock puppets, Brasil-bashers, and "Joined:Today" persons too lazy to use the Search function excluded; cry babies too) |
||
IP Logged |
||
|
andrewfroboy
Senior Member
Joined: 16 April 2009 Location: Brazil Online Status: Offline Posts: 1123 |
![]() Posted: 17 August 2012 at 12:59 |
|
Are you serious? Investment and especially infrastructure and educational investment are the only way to create sustainable growth that will last. Without investment a countries production capacity never grows, with consumption continuing to grow the country will suffer from high inflation and debt. People might be used to poor infrastructure, but it chokes long term economic growth. |
||
IP Logged |
||
|
Amsterdam
Senior Member
Joined: 02 March 2012 Location: Brazil Online Status: Offline Posts: 1074 |
![]() Posted: 17 August 2012 at 13:05 |
|
|
Edited by Amsterdam - 27 August 2012 at 22:46 |
||
IP Logged |
||
|
IrishNatal
Senior Member
Joined: 07 June 2011 Location: Brazil Online Status: Offline Posts: 337 |
![]() Posted: 17 August 2012 at 13:17 |
|
The (False) economy of Brazil may be stronger, but thats where it ends! London has a much better infrastructure than anywhere in Brazil (even if all the work was completed), also they had the capability and desire to have their work completed on time. They had a population that can take instruction and follow simple instructions to facilitate the games happening in their city. When 11th hour problems arose with security they were able to draw upon their organised armed forces to plug the gaps. On the evidence of preparations thus far, could anyone see Brazil being capable of the same? Thought not!
|
||
IP Logged |
||
|
andrewfroboy
Senior Member
Joined: 16 April 2009 Location: Brazil Online Status: Offline Posts: 1123 |
![]() Posted: 17 August 2012 at 13:24 |
|
|
Talking about roads, airports, ports etc. the lack of those have incredibly and will continue to limit Brazil's growth. The fact that São Paulo and Rio are so big and influential is a result of poor infrastruture in the rest of the country. Transportation costs in Brasil are twice that of Brasil and the US has nearly 20 times more roads per square mile. Not to mention how lack of education investment and poor education investment (public universities) are stunting growth.
|
||
IP Logged |
||
|
Amsterdam
Senior Member
Joined: 02 March 2012 Location: Brazil Online Status: Offline Posts: 1074 |
![]() Posted: 17 August 2012 at 13:26 |
|
|
Edited by Amsterdam - 27 August 2012 at 22:46 |
||
IP Logged |
||
|
Amsterdam
Senior Member
Joined: 02 March 2012 Location: Brazil Online Status: Offline Posts: 1074 |
![]() Posted: 17 August 2012 at 13:29 |
|
|
Edited by Amsterdam - 27 August 2012 at 22:46 |
||
IP Logged |
||
|
andrewfroboy
Senior Member
Joined: 16 April 2009 Location: Brazil Online Status: Offline Posts: 1123 |
![]() Posted: 17 August 2012 at 13:36 |
|
|
Airports are still lacking incredibly, there are few quality international airports for the size of the country. Public education is pitiful and most Brazilians can't afford private. A couple of roads is a start, but again 13% of GDP is being wasted on public servants retiring in their 50s, that money will help the country a lot more being invested in the future and not in holding up the past. If you seriously think Brazilian infrastructure is okay you are not trying to do any business on a national level.
|
||
IP Logged |
||
| << Prev Page of 11 Next >> |
|
||
Forum Jump |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
|